LU Lower Weights 21-22
Re: LU Lower Weights 21-22
Oracle
Whiz Wit
You guys are getting tedious and making this subject intolerable to read.
Hoping you guys put an end to it.
- Asking for a friend.
PS - trying to curb my own urge to pontificate.
Whiz Wit
You guys are getting tedious and making this subject intolerable to read.
Hoping you guys put an end to it.
- Asking for a friend.
PS - trying to curb my own urge to pontificate.
Re: LU Lower Weights 21-22
Just the facts,vs b.s -- Pat's tenure thru 2020:
7th in Top 10 dual teams, 2009-2020 (with 7, plus one 11th)
9th in W's vs Top 15 dual teams (23) (2009-2019) .…. next: 16-Mich, 14-V.Tech, 11-Illinois
new LU total of 26 thru 2020
Rank 5th in 3+ A/As in 9 yrs (2011-19) … tied with Ohio St, Va Tech, Minn (7 ea)
*next are : 6-Missouri, 5 ea-Mich, Nebraska; 4-ILL; 3-Iowa St, NC State, Ariz St
5th, most Rd12s prior 2 yrs (11)….
6th, NCAA finalists, 2011-20 (tied w/Minn, 7 ea) …next: 6-MO, ILL 5 ea-Mich, NCS; 4 ea- ASU, Okla, Edin; 3 ea- NW, NE. Rutgers, Va Tech, NW ….Lehigh’s 7 is more than Nebraska, Va Tech combined
9th in A/As (26) from 2010-19 ….next: 25-Neb; 24-Mich; 23-IL; 20-Wisc; 18-Okla; 16-IowaSt; 15-NW
9th in Overall Recruiting (since 2010)………….…… ahead of ISU, Oklahoma, Illinois, Missouri
10th-most in Indiv. NCAA titles 2011-19 (2 ea - tied with ISU, MN, MI, OK, RU …. (1 ea- NE, VT, NW, UNI)
Last titles won: 2011-Nebraska; 2012-Michigan; 2013-Minnesota
One of just 10 schools with five straight NCAA Top 15 teams during 2015-2019
One of 10 with an AA in 10 straight seasons.
7th in Top 10 dual teams, 2009-2020 (with 7, plus one 11th)
9th in W's vs Top 15 dual teams (23) (2009-2019) .…. next: 16-Mich, 14-V.Tech, 11-Illinois
new LU total of 26 thru 2020
Rank 5th in 3+ A/As in 9 yrs (2011-19) … tied with Ohio St, Va Tech, Minn (7 ea)
*next are : 6-Missouri, 5 ea-Mich, Nebraska; 4-ILL; 3-Iowa St, NC State, Ariz St
5th, most Rd12s prior 2 yrs (11)….
6th, NCAA finalists, 2011-20 (tied w/Minn, 7 ea) …next: 6-MO, ILL 5 ea-Mich, NCS; 4 ea- ASU, Okla, Edin; 3 ea- NW, NE. Rutgers, Va Tech, NW ….Lehigh’s 7 is more than Nebraska, Va Tech combined
9th in A/As (26) from 2010-19 ….next: 25-Neb; 24-Mich; 23-IL; 20-Wisc; 18-Okla; 16-IowaSt; 15-NW
9th in Overall Recruiting (since 2010)………….…… ahead of ISU, Oklahoma, Illinois, Missouri
10th-most in Indiv. NCAA titles 2011-19 (2 ea - tied with ISU, MN, MI, OK, RU …. (1 ea- NE, VT, NW, UNI)
Last titles won: 2011-Nebraska; 2012-Michigan; 2013-Minnesota
One of just 10 schools with five straight NCAA Top 15 teams during 2015-2019
One of 10 with an AA in 10 straight seasons.
Re: LU Lower Weights 21-22
>>I guess I mistakenly thought this was a forum for the exchange of ideas and opinions and and not a site for the cheerleaders to post their rah rah cheers.
Dumping on program eez gud (bitch slapping part of free speech)
Positeev not so much .....in fact, eez too often bad; negates the slap
Dumping on program eez gud (bitch slapping part of free speech)
Positeev not so much .....in fact, eez too often bad; negates the slap
Re: LU Lower Weights 21-22
whiz wit: actually, I always try to look in the mirror. If I over-stepped, my apologies. However, in this case, it was a reasonable response to what I (and others) perceived as the kind of comment you would not have made face to face with coach. If that makes me a blowhard, bully etc, well, I can live with that.
Re: LU Lower Weights 21-22
(With apologies to LU808)Oracle wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 12:59 pm whiz wit: actually, I always try to look in the mirror. If I over-stepped, my apologies. However, in this case, it was a reasonable response to what I (and others) perceived as the kind of comment you would not have made face to face with coach. If that makes me a blowhard, bully etc, well, I can live with that.
Funny, but I don't recall you brow beating posters who predicted the margin of LU losses to Penn State in recent years or those who went on record as to which overmatched LU wrestlers would lose to their opponents in various dual meets.
Re: LU Lower Weights 21-22
Brow beating? Hardly my thin-skinned friend. Virtually 100% of the time, posters who get challenged on posts made in poor taste, always claim censorship, cheer-leading, and now brow-beating......wouldn't it have been easier just to note the criticism, than trying to deflect blame to me? And your excuse of saying, in effect, others also post in poor taste, is classic.
This isn't Twitter. The wrestling community is small and while forums can be vicious, it hasn't been here. Again, I would like to hold up Cornell as a model. CU posters rarely post anything negative about anything to do with their program - publicly. The Max Dean transfer is a great example. I'm sure there was plenty of complaining amongst fans but from what I can tell it wasn't taken public. That has been my only point in all this. Keep criticisms private if at all possible. Of course, you can do anything you please....that is your right. But it also my right to take exception. On we go.
This isn't Twitter. The wrestling community is small and while forums can be vicious, it hasn't been here. Again, I would like to hold up Cornell as a model. CU posters rarely post anything negative about anything to do with their program - publicly. The Max Dean transfer is a great example. I'm sure there was plenty of complaining amongst fans but from what I can tell it wasn't taken public. That has been my only point in all this. Keep criticisms private if at all possible. Of course, you can do anything you please....that is your right. But it also my right to take exception. On we go.
Re: LU Lower Weights 21-22
Cornell has outstanding information flow which eliminates a lot of the negativity. Koll shares inside stuff on a regular basis with the Dean situation just being the latest. Fans will speculate endlessly without reliable information.
Re: LU Lower Weights 21-22
>>>>>> Agree. But not all information is created equal. The reasons for the Dean departure differ significantly from that of Edmond Ruth; the latter was, and should have been, handled carefully. It still doesn't mean speculation should turn into unfounded public criticism. One might 'speculate' LU will have difficulty remaining a top 20 NCAA team in 21-22, but to make a public 'statement' that they won't isn't worthy of any self-respecting fan. More likely that comes from opposition camps like Penn State. Shouldn't be coming from our camp. Did I say I agreed with you?
Re: LU Lower Weights 21-22
Actually, the two Greeker bet was for top 15. But don't worry about it. I'm used to you misrepresenting my postings, ignoring my questions and changing the issue by now. I suppose those liberties are one of the benefits of being an oracle.Oracle wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 3:27 pm>>>>>> Agree. But not all information is created equal. The reasons for the Dean departure differ significantly from that of Edmond Ruth; the latter was, and should have been, handled carefully. It still doesn't mean speculation should turn into unfounded public criticism. One might 'speculate' LU will have difficulty remaining a top 20 NCAA team in 21-22, but to make a public 'statement' that they won't isn't worthy of any self-respecting fan. More likely that comes from opposition camps like Penn State. Shouldn't be coming from our camp. Did I say I agreed with you?
Re: LU Lower Weights 21-22
But a true Oracle knows what you're going to say before you say it! (At least couches to seem se)whiz wit wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 5:04 pmActually, the two Greeker bet was for top 15. But don't worry about it. I'm used to you misrepresenting my postings, ignoring my questions and changing the issue by now. I suppose those liberties are one of the benefits of being an oracle.Oracle wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 3:27 pm>>>>>> Agree. But not all information is created equal. The reasons for the Dean departure differ significantly from that of Edmond Ruth; the latter was, and should have been, handled carefully. It still doesn't mean speculation should turn into unfounded public criticism. One might 'speculate' LU will have difficulty remaining a top 20 NCAA team in 21-22, but to make a public 'statement' that they won't isn't worthy of any self-respecting fan. More likely that comes from opposition camps like Penn State. Shouldn't be coming from our camp. Did I say I agreed with you?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Justafan and 44 guests