EIWA -- First-round Opponents
Re: EIWA -- First-round Opponents
You guys who are going on and on about seeding as opposed to wrestling qua wrestling are at risk of incurring the contempt of Oracle. But wait a minute. Oracle is going on and on about seeding.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2023 2:48 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2019 7:57 am
- Contact:
Re: EIWA -- First-round Opponents
You asked "what's wrong with the coaches arguing?" I addressed your question.Oracle wrote: ↑Wed Mar 01, 2023 11:58 am>>>>>>> Not interested in asking the coaches -- this is my opinion. I take it yours is whatever the coaches think. This isn't rocket science, yet they are making it so.NothingMeaningful wrote: ↑Wed Mar 01, 2023 11:29 amWhat's wrong? How about asking *the coaches*, who chose the current system? I'm guessing they thought something was wrong with that system, and that this system was better.
My opinion is that this is the current seeding process, like it or not. I'm not an EIWA coach, so I don't have insight into why *they* changed to process to what it is now. Perhaps JDA can provide insight into what occurred.
Re: EIWA -- First-round Opponents
I simply saying I disagree with it --- not looking for an explanation. Obviously, the coaches gave their blessing to this. Now they have to live with the results. There are only a few teams that it matters to so we shouldn't expect a groundswell of objection from the teams with little to no chance of having qualifiers. Cornell, Penn, Lehigh, Princeton are the main targets. Glory, Yianni and Humphreys are, in reality, unaffected. McGonagle and Brignola are not. But the 3 aforementioned *could* have been affected. That's my point.
Re: EIWA -- First-round Opponents
But you play one on this forum……or did you just sleep at a holiday inn express last night Klehner?
-
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2019 7:57 am
- Contact:
Re: EIWA -- First-round Opponents
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 84 guests